[5.4.1] [Social] Funding Request: ENS Meta-Governance Working Group Term 5 (Q1/Q2)

Happy to see consensus is forming on a path forward that vests $ENS token distributions. It’s good that stewards are well compensated.

@nick.eth Thanks for putting in the time to expand on the processes that led to (most) Term 4 stewards taking a decision to distribute 40,000 unvested $ENS among themselves as compensation. I’m happy that at least some process was followed for this action.

Agreed. The confusion in this thread reveals that there’s room for improvement in how proposed compensation plans are communicated to the DAO. The forum thread in question had zero replies for months. I don’t believe that’s necessarily because everyone agreed with it, but rather because the context was unclear that the DAO was being asked to give feedback and approve a proposal.

@nick.eth and thanks for the point about the price change in $ENS from Term 4 vs. today. I should have written those ideas with more precision to avoid misunderstandings.

Never said that stewards in general aren’t putting in their 100%. Please check what I wrote:

@estmcmxci hope that clarifies. I’ve had multiple stewards look me in the eye and say these things. These are their own words, not mine. I always assume the best in people. For all the stewards who haven’t told me such things, I continue to believe they’re consistently doing their best for ENS. For the stewards who said these things to me, I hope they have a change of heart and improve their approach.

2 Likes