Even if you think that it’s a good idea, I think it should be something that the DAO votes on, rather than at the discretion of a few people.
For example, maybe it can happen this way:
- “Unsavory” name’s grace period ends
- A social proposal is made to the DAO to decide whether the name is “unsavory”, and register the name in the auction then burn it
- If it passes, then the Ecosystem Working Group takes that action
So the working group would still have those funds allocated, but the stewards agree to require a DAO vote before it purchases any names out of auction. If the stewards act without the agreed-upon vote, then they’ve broken the social contract, and the community can vote down future funding proposals.