Comments on ENS Foundation Director Nominees

potentially we need to update our Governance Process Glossary section, with a clear explicit definitions: of Delegate and Listed Delegate
the only section we have about that is:

Delegation : ENS holders cannot vote or create proposals until they delegate their voting rights to an address. Delegation can be given to one address at a time, including the holder’s own address. Note that delegation does not lock tokens; it simply adds votes to the chosen delegation address

The ENS DAO Delegate Applications with its terminology gives a false impression that ENS Delegate is the ones who filled the application -Only-, while in fact any address with ENS voting rights -even 1- is an ENS Delegate and will be castVoteBySig at ensdao.eth EPs but not -and despite the fact that not- every ENS Delegate is a Listed Delegate at

1 Like

Apparently, my delegate application, filed shortly after the airdrop, as a “Listed Delegate” was denied. What are the objective criteria or is it solely a subjective process? How can one be reconsidered for being listed or am I doomed to be a second-class delegate?

The only posts we deleted were those that were unrelated (Eg, weren’t delegate applications), or were direct copy-pastes of other applications. I don’t see any deleted posts by you on that thread.

I didn’t say that anything was deleted. I said, apparently, my application was denied, as I’m not listed as a delegate.

Why does the ENS Foundation Director position need to be elected by the DAO?

Specially, this current DAO.

This DAO reacted exactly the opposite I would expect from a DAO controlling what we claim to be the foundation of Ethereum Web3. I would not trust voting on perhaps the most important position just below the founders of this project to this current DAO.

No one knows more about the qualifications required for this position other than Nick and Brantly. I would suggest letting the core devs (not the DAO Delegates) decide on an interim (or even permanent) candidate. Otherwise, we risk selecting a candidate that does not meet the qualifications and one that may decide to step down (or even get replaced) making the ENS DAO a complete joke in the eyes of the community. Once again.

The Articles of Association of The ENS Foundation sets forth the procedure for appointing the Director, which we must abide by.


I quote:

The ENS Foundation’s Articles of Incorporation give significant powers to the ENS DAO (referred to as “The Council” in the Articles). The DAO may vote to:

  • Appoint or remove a director, member, or supervisor.

  • Prohibit admitting any members in future.

  • Instruct the directors to wind up the foundation, and specify what charity or other foundation should receive the foundation’s assets.

The key word is “may” thus I brought the question. But I suppose at this point the Foundation has accepted to Move for a Dao Appointment.

My follow up question is, does the ENS community feel like the current DAO can successfully find a replacement for this position?

1 Like

The Council is putting forth a vote to decide the question. In my opinion, answering your second question, I believe so.


You show up in the claim app just fine:

The council may choose not to vote, in which case nothing changes. There is no power in the articles for anyone else to appoint or remove a director.



In my view, you meet the minimum qualifications to serve. But it’s the community that chooses.

Good Luck!

1 Like

I would want to discourage the selection of @inplco for this position. My reasons for opposing his nomination are as follows:

  1. inplco played an extremely active and partisan role in herding community opinion during the original incident. While I appreciate that active and involved community discussion is necessary for the governance process, I personally felt his contributions to be too partisan, inflammatory, and coercive (not allowing room for doubt/responding aggressively to anyone expressing doubts about his opinions/appealing to emotions, incredulity, authority/urging immediate action and aggravation).

  2. My perceptions of his conduct can be subjective and i acknowledge that. So, I can understand if my above reservations are discarded. However, his public/partisan involvement (regardless of my views on its propriety) raises an important issue about the conflict of interest in this situation. As one of the most visible proponents for Brantly’s removal. His subsequent selection as Brantly’s replacement would set up an extremely questionable precedent and cast doubt on the motivations of anyone engaging in community accountability in the future.

My suggestion would be to stay away from candidates who can be perceived to have been too partisan in this issue. @AvsA would make an excellent candidate in my opinion. I am pretty new to the ENS ecosystem so I wasn’t sure if I knew enough to make a good choice, but I’m happy to see that many have nominated him already.

1 Like

I agree with this. If I was a bystander, I’ll say the exact same thing and for good reason. I am sure no one sees me as a serious candidate against avsa.eth but I am here to represent not to win. (I have been told that I am a serious candidate :man_shrugging:). Anyway, I hope it will encourage outsiders to play active role in governance and encourage DAO onboarding.


I think anyone will show up in the claim app. @berrios.eth is probably talking about his delegate application here on Discourse so he could be listed as a Delegate. I am pretty sure he was mistakenly overlooked since that application list is probably parsed by hand.

On the side note, this is another loophole that needs plugging:

The “delegate” badge is assigned automatically based on whether the associated account has any votes delegated to it. @berrios.eth If you at least delegate your own votes to yourself, I can update your status in the forum.

1 Like

I believe I have re-delegated my votes back to myself.


1 Like

@berrios.eth Can you add the links to the nominations thread and the EP6 proposal in the text of the post? Similar to how nick has linked this thread in the nominations post. It’ll be useful for people to go back and forth easily instead of getting confused

Aah that make sense, I noticed “delegate” beside my name here before being Listed Delegate or any application…

how discourse system know user == .eth address? aren’t we subject to impersonation attack? That if someone created a new user and call Binance.eth or Coinbase.eth this would create a lot of confusion and noise around contraversial EP election/voting time!

I strongly disagree with a any broad subjective qualification for a candidates of elective position, I mean exactly the candidation process what we are discussing now, and it should be as as little subjectivity as possible (or Non) and that for longevity, furthermore history full of controversial figures who still found huge success and progressed humanity think Jobs, nikola tesla, lady gaga, obama, Muhammad Ali, or Trump!!

:point_right: ENS Foundation Directors Job Description, Responsibilities, Qualifications and Remunerations

1 Like

I agree with you to an extent. The vote and nominees are set for the community to choose from all options.

The “Request Access” form asks for a user’s ENS name, from which we look up their delegated votes. It would be possible to use someone else’s name there - but it’s equally possible to just buy one ENS token and self-delegate it to get the same result.

1 Like

I was going to switch to healingvisions.eth right before this Brantely situation occurred I have a day job for a global Realestate firm. I paint from 2a to 3a in the morning. I am also a founder of the UltraDAO. I bought 10 years of healingvisions.eth. I have 5 Regional Managers and 100s of Community Managers who have 5-20 direct reports. Leasing Consultants, Assistant Mangers, etc.

Nick asked me for my CV but I dropped out because I accepted a COO at another web3 company. I was passionate about ENS, but with everything that transpired. I can’t say that I am anymore. You are right to have your questions, but you can see I am in web3 you can see I was part of UltraDAO and on the Core team of Woodies that made millions in 1 day. I apologize for the late response but I have been focused on supporting people in the Ukraine.

I am not doxxed so I can’t give you proof. I was going to give it to Nick, but the point is moot now. I do strongly urge you all to remove Brantely and find a director candiate that is passionate abour inclusion.

There are plenty of minorities in web3 (women, BIPOC, LGBTQIA, that would be incredible) find them. Encourage them. They will make a difference for ENS.