ENS name:
My reasons for wanting to be a delegate:
CyberConnect is here to build a decentralized social graph protocol that serves Web3 social networks and the metaverse. We’d like to become a ENS delegate to contribute our best effort to make Web3.0 a better palce.
My view on each section of the proposed ENS Constitution
- Name ownership shall not be infringed: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)
AGREED. In my opinion, Web3.0 is all about ownership that everyone should have sovereignty to his/her own virtual identity. This is especially true when it comes to the upcoming Metaverse. - Fees are primarily an incentive mechanism: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)
Being a core component of web3, ENS should be available to most people while having a fee structure decided by the ENS DAO. The community will balance how ENS should be a public good while being sustainable in the long run. - Income funds ENS and other public goods: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)
Again, this should be a long-term discussion within the ENS DAO. - ENS Integrates with the global namespace: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)
As an infrastructure provider on Web3.0, we believe that ENS is so significant in terms of being the golden standard of name service. We don’t know how exactly will web 3.0 look like, but it’s definitely important to integrate it into the current landscape of the namespace.
My web3 qualifications / skills:
Extensive techniques in development. Web3.0 and DAO native organization.