ENS name: monoky.eth
My reasons for wanting to be a delegate: I’ve been active in the blockchain space since early 2017 and decentralization and giving the power back to the people are core beliefs of mine. I’d like to represent the community and grow the ENS ecosystem by being actively involved in the DAO and the aiding in the decision making process moving forward.
My view on each section of the proposed ENS Constitution
-
Name ownership is an absolute right: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)** Agree. With the world moving to a decentralized, Web3, Metaverse design, the ability to have a unique digital identity will be very important moving forward.
-
Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)** Somewhat agree. I feel the fees should keep the project and protocol running, but people should not be alienated from Web3 and an online identity based on economic reasons.
-
Income funds ENS and other public goods: (Agree/Disagree/Comment)** Agree 100%. This is pretty clear that this is how the project can continue to sustain itself and grow.
-
ENS Integrates with the global namespace: (Agree/Disagree/Comment) Agree. I see this as one of the core elements that ENS should strive for. ENS should be pushing for integration into everything in the digital space and metaverse.
My web3 qualifications / skills: I’ve worked in blockchain for several different chains since 2017 and have been a Web3 developer for that same period. Currently working with several NFT projects, building in the metaverse and I’m an active DAO delegate on multiple currently active projects.
[/quote]