ENS name: Commish
My reasons for wanting to be a delegate: I have spent the last 9 years in privacy/security (startups to FAANG) of web2.0 and believe strongly in the advancement of privacy/security in the web3 space.
My view on each section of the proposed ENS Constitution
- Name ownership is an absolute right: (Agree/Disagree/Comment) - Agree. At its core the identity individuals choose to pursue in web3 need to be owned and controlled by the individuals, not centralized.
- Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism: (Agree/Disagree/Comment) - Agreed. Registration fees offer a scaling solution for all individuals to get into ownership, and ownership they can control, without compromising on the underlying foundation being able to continue to operate.
- Income funds ENS and other public goods: (Agree/Disagree/Comment) - Agree. ENS is not a point in time development and continual funding of this space, within a defined and prioritized roadmap, is critical to ensure the longevity of ENS that individuals own and control.
- ENS Integrates with the global namespace: (Agree/Disagree/Comment) - Disagree that this is a requirement of ENS, agree that it should be a goal to achieve. Global namespace is a benefit to offer to the community but is not required for continuous success of the ENS foundation.
My web3 qualifications / skills:
- Founder of privacy startup in 2010, acquired in 2012.
- Product Manager across startups and FAANG since acquisition, all within privacy and security.
- Working on e2ee at global scale for messaging services. Core principles align with how to bring web3 to the masses in a secure manner.
- Developer/tinkerer in free time. Being a PM in principle doesn’t mean a lot unless you get your hands dirty and launch as well.