ENS name: xxy01.eth
My reasons for wanting to be a delegate: I want to support the development of ENS to make it as durable, robust, accessible and scalable as possible, with the goal of making it the Web3 standard for naming.
My view on each section of the [proposed ENS Constitution ] (Proposed ENS Constitution )
- Name ownership is an absolute right: ( Agree /Disagree/Comment)- Agree.At its core the identity individuals choose to pursue in web3 need to be owned and controlled by the individuals, not centralized.
- Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism: ( Agree /Disagree/Comment)- Agree.Registration fees offer a scaling solution for all individuals to get into ownership, and ownership they can control, without compromising on the underlying foundation being able to continue to operate.
- Income funds ENS and other public goods: ( Agree /Disagree/Comment)- Agree.ENS is not a point in time development and continual funding of this space, within a defined and prioritized roadmap, is critical to ensure the longevity of ENS that individuals own and control.
- ENS Integrates with the global namespace: ( Agree /Disagree/Comment) - Agree.As long as decentralization is preserved. This being said, I am not afraid to admit that I would want to hear more debate on this topic/have more supporting arguments. What does the “greatest extent possible without sacrificing decentralization” look like?
My web3 qualifications / skills: I have basic web3/solidity skills. I’m more familiar with the algorand ecosystem from a development perspective. However I am also a software developer and data scientist by trade and have experience with a number of programming languags, databases, and machine learning frameworks.