Berrios the only ones I’ve seen was a suggestions of set of qualifications not an actual ones agreed on or voted, and I argue further those qualification here Nominations for ENS Foundation Director to replace Brantly.eth are great, lovely things to have and consider on voting but shouldn’t be an actual Eligibility for a candidate, eligibility means whom there allowed to put himself in place to be voted for as ENS Director, something objective such as clean “non-criminal record” that goes without saying but do you want we vote today or in 5 years for someone can’t actually perform his job say:
- He is subject to some financial sanctions!
- undischarged bankrupt (legally he can’t act in capacity of director in Cayman)
- under the legal age to be director Cayman which is 18
- or has a criminal record and so the foundation can’t really establish a banking relations due to that?
Furthermore why would we want to discuss terms, compensation after the voting not before, the voter has all rights to know clearly what he is voting for. and despite anything regarding the operations and actual tasks of the director he remain for everyone outside and the media The figurative head of the ENS Foundation guys this is why at first place you are replacing Brantly.eth today!