ENS Public Goods meeting (may 10): should we use part of the unclaimed airdrops to incentivize core ethereum developers?

[nick.eth]

@accessor.eth

I believe that sending $7 million dollars worth of a token sent to 111 people or 111 addresses; with approx 30 of them being blank, as in little too zero activity definitely raises a see a flag.

I don’t see why looking into the security of dao funds is not advisable. If nobody looks into it— then that just makes the DAO vulnerable to social engineering.

The only relevant question here is who owns the accounts - are they the people they are supposed to be, and are those people the ones we want to reward with grants? What they do with the funds - and whether or not they’ve used that address in the past - is not relevant.

@accessor.eth

That being said, I think that ENS DAO should require:

How tokens are given out is up to the protocol guild. Whether we grant tokens to the PG is up to us.

[alisha.eth]

A Draft Proposal to support the Protocol Guild Pilot is now live, as at 26 May.

[EP13][Executable] Support the Protocol Guild Pilot

Status Active Discussion Thread Discuss Votes Snapshot - passed Onchain - active Authors Trent Van Epps (PG Member), Tim Beiko (PG Member) Description This is a proposal for the ENS DAO to support the Protocol Guild Pilot, a vested split contract which directs funding to 110 Ethereum core protocol contributors over one year. Abstract We propose that 200k ENS (~3.7% of the unclaimed airdrop) be allocated in recognition of past and ongoing work of these core contributors. ENS…