I am not sure if this is a good idea as stewards are in the strange situation that whoever expresses “Against” will highly likely be voted out on the next election of the limited steward slot (8 → 3) whereas expressing “For” doesn’t affect their next slot as the slot number are not cut down. @spencecoin did express his voice as “Against” because he already expressed that he doesn’t have a horse in this race.
Overall I support the proposal as long as the existing community WG members and stewards remain motivated and keep participating under the new ecosystem WG even if they aren’t elected due to the reduced elected steward positions (8 → 3).
I served as a TNL steward only for a limited period (just 3 months) but I have been impressed with how lively the community WG has been, and I only wish that the transition goes smoothly to accelerate the DAO activity.