I want to thank the MetaGov stewards and all community members who decided to speak up and discuss the situation, it takes a lot of integrity and character to participate in controversial issues. @jkm.eth @Arnold @AvsA thank you for your voices.
To be clear, I still fundamentally disagree with the conclusion here. My stance remains that when administrative error happens, we must appeal to the objective rules and the actual recorded data - which showed a definitive 928k to 516k delegate preference in our direct matchup - rather than deferring to an informal consensus and broad assumptions.
My intent in pushing this discussion was to better the DAO by highlighting some of the obvious problems we have. Preserving the integrity and objectivity of our governance process is incredibly important, and I felt these flaws needed to be put on the record.
I certainly have no desire to create unnecessary commotion endlessly. The harmony of the DAO, especially during current turbulent period should be preserved.
A huge thank you to every delegate who took the time to cast a vote for me, every single person who voted for me showed incredible confidence in me and I greatly appreciate it.
With this I will step aside and end the dispute here.