Don’t mean to encroach but…
It’s correct to point out that the Meta-gov budget did not include a line item for dedicated governance provider support. But from a capacity standpoint, the Meta-gov multisig currently holds more than enough funds to accommodate Tally’s request (see enswallets.xyz).
That said, I’m not sure what Meta-Gov already has allocated or prioritized, and I’m not looking to disrupt that calculus. I’m just raising the question of whether there’s a way to support Tally without requiring an onchain vote.
On further thought, I do think a DAO-level endorsement would send a strong signal to the broader ecosystem—that Tally is co-signed by ENS DAO.
Edit: I’d like to clarify that I didn’t specify what kind of signal a DAO-level endorsement would send to the broader ecosystem—I’ll leave that open to interpretation.