Very well formulated proposal. Well done for all of detail that went into this idea.
While I remain neither for nor against the idea of a second air drop at this stage, I do have a couple of ideas for potential metrics in which holders could be rewarded and or selected to receive some form of airdrop…
-
Identify the wallets from the 1st airdrop (excluding any DAO members) who held onto the tokens once claimed vs the wallets that straight away listed them on the market/swapped them. This could be used to reward those who believed in the power of holding onto “responsibility” over those who prefer to trade…?
-
identify wallets and domains that have been proactively built upon, from as simple as setting a reverse record to adding in text records, IPFS websites and/or creation of pre offical wrapper subdomains. Etc.
-
instead of direct $ / ENS token airdrop, perhaps reward the selected holders with automated domain extensions. This could be done discreetly and then made public once the Airdrop went live…obviously the exact metrics of how long and how many domains to extend would need to be voted on.
-
Possibly offer discounts for future domain maintenance in the form of vouchers / coupons that could be redeemed only via ENS.domains and only on completion of a set of opt-in governance related topics, such as joining this forum, and answering a simple questionnaire for much needed accurate customer feedback for example.
Anyway, just a few ideas that I feel could be valuable and not thought of yet.
Interesting times indeed ! 🫶🏽💫
Meta8.eth