[Temp Check] ENS Token 2nd Airdrop

[NameApe-192.eth]

There are already several threads where .eth holders AFTER the airdrop are asking for more representation. IMHO, basically this is up to existing $ENS holders in terms of action. The .eth holders can make a lot of noise on twitter or here but buying enough $ENS tokens to even push for a proposal is unlikely.

How do we move from a temp check to a draft proposal?

Discussion: Should .eth holders have the right to participate in ENS governance voting?

Why is this correct? Because it’s a fact that large shareholders in some companies have a say in how the company is operated. It all depends on how they formed the organization, structurally. I did not say this. Correct If I own the most apple devices in the entire world, should I be granted the right to cast votes about how apple is operated? By all means, you are free to discuss this. Nobody is preventing you from doing so.

Should We Dissolve the ENS Token?

It’s used as one. That’s all that matters. Token holders decide what happens with the money and project. It’s a security in most of the world. It’s a governance failure. Most people made a lot of money from the airdrop who are OGs, but OGs mostly don’t have interest in buying it for governance reasons. Maybe you should’ve read the contract before offering an opinion on something so strongly. :-/ function sweep(address dest) external onlyOwner { require(block.timestamp > claimPeriod…

The next goal is to gather the Top 3 options from this Temp Check in order to move forward to receiving delegate support.

Is there a poll that we can setup on forum to move ahead? What are the 3 options? Here is what I think passes the temp check so far.

1. Do nothing
2. Distribute a small amount of $ENS to each .eth primary address
3. Allowing each .eth a vote without needing to distribute $ENS tokens that can be sold