Actually, I believe this discussion has surfaced multiple current issues which are likely to perpetuate themselves.
These are structural in issue, and DAO members would do well to accept that these issues can be improved with more distributed governance.
Instead of framing the issue as a mercantilist issue, it might be more constructive to truly consider the underlying issues that are being proposed.
I also believe that the concerns with forum or ENS governance participation can be alleviated with outreach from DAO members to the community in natural areas of congregation. I see more and more community members coming on board, much less the other way round.
Also, I dont understand how @thenftverse.eth survey and his approach has been not followed the process?
Seems pretty respectable, SMART (Specific, measurable, actionable, relevant and time based)
- Temp Check, gathering comments and feedback
- Survey
- Review and round up (with further actions to take)
How should participants do otherwise?