Appreciative of you coming on the forum and sharing your thoughts. Others can, and should do the same.
The forum is where these discussions happen. Respectfully, individuals passionate about ENS should be checking the forum anyway. If people need a tweet to signpost them to this discussion I would argue they are not that interested in ENS.
Less intuitive. Longer.
Hard disagree.
I appreciate that there are precedent considerations but at this stage this is a single 2 letter name. If the potential revenue loss is dangerous to the functioning of the DAO, we have bigger problems…
The wider discussion about issuing 1 and 2 character names is here:
I mentioned my personal interest in having a separate registration controller explicitly for ultra clear transparency on which names the DAO are voting to directly allocate. I am only supportive of the allocation of l2.eth at this point, as I agree that more general allocation does have an abundance of associated social/revenue/allocation considerations.
I think we should get a move on and make this happen.