[temp check] Renew Service Providers Program for Season 2

[Premm.eth]

@AvsA

I believe we should not encourage more small budget projects, but rather more ambitious high quality ones.

Thanks for this clarity. I think, in general, there is an interest in better understanding the goals of the Service Provider Program.

Is it designed for routine services provided to the DAO? Is it designed for moonshot innovation? Is it designed to incubate ENS-related projects?

What if a team is providing high-quality services to the ENS DAO but does not require a minimum $300k budget?

@AvsA

The 2 year pool will have a separate budget (⅓ of the per annum of the others) so that it encourages organizations not to asks too much for their extended budget, otherwise they can miss on having more stability, nor asking too much as their minimum budget or risk not getting into the program at all.

How exactly does this work? I think, for most teams, the #1 goal will be to get funding, and getting two years of funding is a nice-to-have but will not play into sizing their budget request.

When I started running some numbers and scenarios, I found that the minimum budget only comes into play for the last funded team. Therefore, the incentives are for teams to ask for very high amounts for their extended budgets and very low amounts for their minimum budgets.