Hey Kent, check out the notes from last week’s meeting here for context. Essentially, the social proposal technically did not meet quorum, and so another social vote is warranted.
—
If this is the case and there are no changes to the codebase, I presume we wouldn’t need an executable vote (correct me if I am mistaken).
Looking forward to hearing about your new approach to implementing this bond mechanism to lower the threshold for submitting executable proposals!