Changing the workflow for executable proposals

[estmcmxci]

@nick.eth

I’d like to propose a change: Executable votes can go straight from Draft to an onchain vote, but the proposer must put up a deposit in ENS - say 100 ENS for the sake of argument - that is forfeit if the proposal fails. The deposit could be sent to the DAO wallet or burned.

@nick.eth I agree that this would streamline proposals and make it more accessible, while maintaining the quality of proposals as well.

@meta8.eth

Obviously as I’m sure you are aware there is a current frenzy/hype/mania happening across the board with ENS - it seems that many alliances / clubs / call it what you like are being formed around ideals that lack a real sense of what ENS is and or can be…I feel as if there needs to be far more time spent on education

Agree. @matoken.eth has mentioned the need for Education on his Twitter Thread. The Learn Docs is a great place to start.

For reference:

@estmcmxci

@khori.eth

I wonder if this education vision animates anyone else?

Totally does. We can start by completing and formally publishing the Learn Docs initiative that the (now dissolved) Community Working Group picked up in Term 1. Check it out here: Welcome! - ENS Learn Doc