Dhive Communication Thread

[clowes.eth]

Thanks for building this out - always beeen a fan of the interesting visuals by you guys.

Drop me or one of the Metagov stewards (@5pence.eth @daostrat.eth @alextnetto.eth) a message with your Telegram - there is an ongoing discussion about the changes to the SP program proposed here:

[Temp Check] [Social] Service Provider Season 2 Vote Amendment Proposal

That’s because you are still thinking in terms of funding companies, rather than projects. The point of this program is to fund projects, not companies. If your project is better than 3 other projects, it should get 3 points (not 7 - not sure where that figure is from). If a company is on the cutoff, only their strongest projects should get funded, in preference to their weaker ones. To be clear, there’s no “splitting votes” in Copeland. If you offer two budgets and all your voters rank them …

One of us will add you to the conversation.

@alextnetto.eth has created an interface he’s just shared:

SPP2 voting

I believe @Agora are building an interface too.

This is one of the downsides of closed (albeit accessible) conversations - it makes it hard for passionate and capable builders (like dHive) to contribute. We should push to change that.