Dhive Communication Thread

[dhive]

✧.⭒ Happy New Year from the Dhive Team!

As we step into the new year, we want to thank everyone for your support. Your involvement means so much to us!

This thread will serve as our hub for updating the ENS DAO. Here, we’ll share proposal results, governance-related metrics, and exciting developments as we continue our mission to make governance data more accessible.

We hope these updates will keep you informed, spark meaningful discussions, and pique your interest in exploring what Dhive has to offer.

We’re also opening this space for your feedback and suggestions! We’re always open to hear your thoughts and improve our project to better serve the community.

Let’s make 2025 a great year filled with success, collaboration, and good governance!

[dhive]

Gm frENS ✧

Happy to announce that Dhive has leveled up and would like to share with the community our new and exciting features:

⟐ Token holdings data is now available.
⟐ New governance metrics on profiles.
⟐ New and improved analytics dashboard for daos.
⟐ Proposals have a timeline for the voting cycle.
⟐ Charts can now be downloaded.
⟐ Profile identities support Base and Linea subdomains.
⟐ UI/UX improvements and performance optimization.

We invite you to take a moment to explore these features on dhive.io and share with us your thoughts and feedback.

Thank you & happy governance!

[dhive]

We've hit 1,000 active users! 🎉

What started as a hackathon project has grown into a valuable platform, and we're just getting started! pic.twitter.com/zAxLCGbEqB

— Dhive (@DhiveDotIo) February 26, 2025

[dhive]

Gm frENS ✧

Excited to share a new addition to our voting visualizations - an interactive chart to explore Copeland voting outcomes!

It was challenging to solve, but we stuck to our core principles of clear, clean, and traceable charts which guide all of our data visualizations.

And here’s our solution:

⟐ Pairwise comparison chart showing how each option scores in head-to-head matchups
⟐ Final scores are marked to highlight how they are calculated across all comparisons
⟐ Viewable votes distribution of any matchup by clicking on the score to reveal it
⟐ Designed to complement platforms where scores are shown but the logic behind them isn’t

---

---

We wanted to be ready for the upcoming proposal using the Copeland voting method and help bring more transparency to how voting results are derived.

As always, feedback is very welcome.

Thank you & happy voting!

[clowes.eth]

Thanks for building this out - always beeen a fan of the interesting visuals by you guys.

Drop me or one of the Metagov stewards (@5pence.eth @daostrat.eth @alextnetto.eth) a message with your Telegram - there is an ongoing discussion about the changes to the SP program proposed here:

[Temp Check] [Social] Service Provider Season 2 Vote Amendment Proposal

That’s because you are still thinking in terms of funding companies, rather than projects. The point of this program is to fund projects, not companies. If your project is better than 3 other projects, it should get 3 points (not 7 - not sure where that figure is from). If a company is on the cutoff, only their strongest projects should get funded, in preference to their weaker ones. To be clear, there’s no “splitting votes” in Copeland. If you offer two budgets and all your voters rank them …

One of us will add you to the conversation.

@alextnetto.eth has created an interface he’s just shared:

SPP2 voting

I believe @Agora are building an interface too.

This is one of the downsides of closed (albeit accessible) conversations - it makes it hard for passionate and capable builders (like dHive) to contribute. We should push to change that.