ENS: Propagating Use Cases, Registrations and Exposure

Thanks for starting this discussion. It’s obvious that the DAO should put its treasury to productive use, and you’ve outlined some interesting approaches.

  1. ENScribe is a no brainer, although perhaps either of the Working Groups could allocate ENS they currently hold and run a pilot program instead, in order to first measure how effective this approach is. No DAO voting is required for this—it’s a small bet for a potentially big return. Since @Meta-Gov_Stewards have a mandate to further decentralize the protocol by distributing governance ($ENS), it would be reasonable to task them with leading this initiative. Though it wouldn’t hurt for other Working Groups to chip in as well.
  2. Pokémon is fun! But I wonder about the possible NIL infringement and the exposure to litigation this opens the foundation up to—especially from Nintendo, who I imagine ENS Labs would probably want to work out a deal with at some point to integrate ENS into their gaming ecosystem. Maybe @Alexu can shed some light here? Why not continue to develop the ‘FRENS’ brand through curated activations instead?
  3. I love to see Labs thinking of ways to sweeten up those Web2 deals, and this approach feels like it could be the most promising and highest-impact of all. That said, my sense is that those allocations would have to be very sizable ($1M or more, perhaps) in order to get any real bite—these are quite material distributions, after all. danch.eth has recently started a thread that provides a very rigorous assessment of the second- and third-order effects of changing protocol registration fees at different increments and scenarios. My suggestion here is to tread lightly and begin with a similar research approach. The pricing thread offers a solid precedent: we should apply that same rigor to model downstream effects and ensure $ENS distributions are not just generous, but genuinely catalytic.

Don’t want to read the wall of text? Here are bullet points that summarize my thoughts:

  • ENScribe good. Allocation could go through through the Working Groups instead.
  • Watch out for potential exposure to litigation if you don’t secure NIL rights for Pokémon fun.
  • Highest ROI idea, if done right. Consult @kpk @danch.quixote and do a quant analysis.
3 Likes