Hi ENSPunks! I see what you mean.
Since the beginning of 2024, 2 rounds of small grants have been conducted, both within the framework of the PG WG.
In Round 12, an organization without an ENS name (listed as UPE in the application) won 0.25 ETH. For some reason, I thought it was related to Bloom Network. I assume the final distribution will be to real addresses, not to the names listed in the spreadsheet, so it’s unlikely that such errors would result in the wrong wallet being distributed.
This is my mistake. However, as I pointed out here, when building the ENS Ledger, the final recipient databases were filled in manually, and frankly, half of the recipients of ENS funds do not have an ENS name. This is a good reason to give grant winners a 5L+ name if they do not have one.
@AvsA I think this should be corrected in the executable proposal.
Instead of this row:
bloomnetwork.eth – $ 1,881.11
These should be used:
bloomnetwork.eth – $ 940.56
UPE – $ 940.56
@ENSPunks.eth If you meant something else, here is the list of winners of rounds 12&13; this information matches that provided on the ENS grant platform:
Wallet
12th: 3 ETH
13th: 1 ETH
Wallet
12th: 0.25 ETH
13th: 3 ETH
Wallet
12th: 2 ETH
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
13th: 2 ETH
Wallet
12th: 1 ETH
Wallet
12th: 0.25 ETH
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
12th: 0.25 ETH
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
12th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
12th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
13th: 0.25 ETH
Wallet
13th: 0.25 ETH