EP4.9 Voting Reports Discussion

[nick.eth]

Continuing the discussion from EP4.9 Voting Reports:

@brantlymillegan

Scope question
As discussed in this thread here , the program rules explicitly make provision for projects like EFP (see 9.3) and Alex who wrote the rules said he intentionally left eligibility criteria open/vague. Nick’s interpretation of scope is much more restrictive than the program’s rules. Of course, delegates may vote for whatever projects they want for whatever reasons they want, but I don’t want other delegates to think that Nick’s interpretation of scope is what the rules say.

The proposal the DAO approved states the following:

This proposal aims to utilize new funds to establish funding streams for service providers dedicated to the continuous evolution and enhancement of the ENS system.

I think my interpretation of the intention of the streaming payments is in line with the rules. If it’s not immediately clear, it’s up to projects to explain how they are “dedicated to the continuous evolution and enhancement of the ENS system”.