Totally agree
In addition to the amendment, I think at least 20% of the participating tokens can be amended, as this proposal is a constitutional level proposal for ENS.
2 Likes
目前具体是什么细则，还在等待中吗？不是很清楚当前的规则
1 Like
同意，支持社区共同治理，长久激励政策跟随
I. The name absolute should be the main right. Holder have rights to do with their EN, but do not do any KYC in the future, this is blockchain world. and Maybe one day we will enter the metaverse, and ENS is the passport.
II. People who hold ENS token can be discount to register the name, but should not free for it, or it will become so massvie. And ENS DAO should be developed in the future, this needs money.
III. the funds and income can be given to your ENS team, because you guys work for it. Although you have token, but that is 2 things. I hope you can do more to ENS and make it better. I think you are the future of web3.
IV. yes, ENS needs to integrate with other namesapce. and I hope you can do some thing for other chains.
V. I think we can have a page like Terrastation, voters can easily vote for that. and we just do the majortiy.
6 Likes
I. Name ownership is an absolute right（Permissible）
II. Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism（Permissible）
III. Income funds ENS and other public goods（Permissible）
IV. ENS Integrates with the global namespace（Permissible）
V. Amendments to this constitution by majority vote（Permissible）
I support the joining conditions of all DAO members that I have seen so far, because the prerequisite for choosing ENS and blockchain is to have absolute consensus and trust.
I applied to become a member of the DAO because of unconditional trust and consensus in the blockchain. At the same time, our community also has to learn and make more interesting blockchain links to support liquidity and more charity and feedback in real life!
11 Likes
I agree with these four rules.
5 Likes
ENS name:
我想成为一名代表的原因:
我对每一部分的看法提出存在宪法
- 姓名所有权是一项绝对权利:(同意/不同意/评论)
- 注册费作为一种激励机制存在:(同意/不同意/评论)
- 收入基金、ENS和其他公共物品:(同意/不同意/评论)
- ENS与全局命名空间集成:(同意/不同意/评论)
我的web3资格/技能:
totally agree !
I will support community governance and expand the ENS ecosystem
6 Likes
Agreed .The Article 4 shall not create new top-level domain names at will. ETH is the most powerful proof and performance of ETH’s ecology. simple and clear
4 Likes
I support this proposed constitution and have no amendments.
3 Likes
I have spent a portion of my career leading organizations and this constitution would be much improved if it set the 30,000 principles and had a mission - what does ENS DAO want to achieve; vision - what is the position and influence in the world it wishes to have; and values statement - ie fairness - what that means, respect - what that means… etc , in lieu of discrete examples. In this way many if not most future responses to eventualities will not be reactive.
4 Likes
1 Name ownership is an absolute right: (Agree)
2 Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism: (Agree)
3Income funds ENS and other public goods: (Agree)
4 ENS Integrates with the global namespace: (Agree)
4 Likes
I agree to support the voting agreement, and our community will always support it.
3 Likes
Agreed .The Article 4 shall not create new top-level domain names at will. ETH is the most powerful proof and performance of ETH’s ecology. simple and clear
3 Likes
ENS is a key and a reflection of the other side of each of us. We must protect its uniqueness. At the same time, I am very optimistic about the development of ENS in the future, and I believe that everyone will find it more and more important. So I agree with the five points above.
2 Likes
I agree to all of these rules and support for DAO
- Name ownership is an absolute right: (Agree)
- Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism: (Agree)
- Income funds ENS and other public goods: (Agree/Disagree)
- ENS Integrates with the global namespace: (Agree)
3 Likes
Agree to all paragraphs. And to establish of constitution is good to growth of ethereum market.
3 Likes
I. Name ownership is an absolute right（Permissible）
II. Registration fees exist as an incentive mechanism（Permissible）
III. Income funds ENS and other public goods（Permissible）
IV. ENS Integrates with the global namespace（Permissible）
V. Amendments to this constitution by majority vote（Permissible）
[/quote]
3 Likes
Hi, I have added an application to be a delegate in that thread, but I was hoping to check in here about gas costs associated with that.
I would really like to be a delegate, but I don’t have the funds to pay for the gas associated with adding an avatar and the delegate link. That seems a little exclusionary to me and it’s the type of thing I am keen to avoid for future governance mechanisms.
Am I misunderstanding the process? I’m pretty new to the crypto space and have said as much in my application - I would like to to ensure that the decentralised web continues to be accessible for those who don’t fully understand or can’t easily afford the technology but who agree with the principles.
Thanks 
1 Like
I totally agree with this proposal it gives significance to the legacy of DNS naming system for owning in terms of naming system. Without tsactificing the decentralization of ENS.
2 Likes