From this DAO-Wide guidance
Does the Ecosystem WG or subgroups have specific goals for which funds are being requested (ie: instead of a general “support hackathons” description, a specific goal would be “host ENS hackathon”)? Or is this budget designed to be mostly discretionary, with goals “to be determined”? I understand that we’re still figuring all these things out, but community members might feel more comfortable if requested funds are first attached to concrete and measurable goals.
This is tricky. Even if a conflicted steward recuses themselves, they still exert influence via their working relationships with the other voters. If I were a steward, I might not feel comfortable voting down a colleague’s funding request, potentially poisoning the team dynamics moving forward (I wouldn’t expect a begrudged steward to sponsor my “supplemental compensation” request, for example). @slobo.eth would you be willing to forgo active solicitation of funding grants for projects you’re involved in during this first term?
$1000/month is a solid middle-class, full-time, monthly wage in many parts of the world, but would only fund a few hours of time from a top lawyer/developer/manager. What type of time commitment can the community expect from their stewards for this compensation? Did some type of hours * rate
calculation go into this $1000 figure? Would the stewards be willing to document roughly how they’re spending their time?