[RFC] Aligning Governance and Developer Incentives on Namechain

You’re right that offering gas subsidies on Namechain isn’t a meaningful builder incentive, since fees will be trivial. I had overlooked that, but the spirit of the design still has merit.

It’s worth exploring this further in the context of rewarding verified, ENS-aligned participants — perhaps through a “voters-as-builders” or “verified builders” pilot.

How can we structure alignment between voters, builders, and the protocol itself? Let’s naively scope what it means to become a “verified, ENS-aligned delegate” and how a rewards system could work.


Scope: "Aligned Identity

Baseline criteria for a verified, ENS-aligned delegate :

  1. Delegate record set (onchain, self-selected identity).
  2. PoH (e.g., Dentity or World ID).

For simplicity, assume these two conditions define an Aligned Identity the DAO can track whenever someone participates in governance.

We could design a Watcher that monitors governance activity and batches verified participants:

#  alignment watcher (pseudocode)

def is_verified_delegate(address):
    return has_delegate_record(address) and is_poh_verified(address)

def track_aligned_voters(proposal_id):
    aligned_voters = []
    for voter in get_voters(proposal_id):
        if is_verified_delegate(voter):
            aligned_voters.append(voter)
    return aligned_voters

This renders a per-proposal list of “aligned and verified” participants.


Rewards distribution logic

Rather than gas subsidies, distribute wENS: an internal, redeemable unit (think “ENS miles”), earned for aligned participation and developer actions.

# wENS distribution (pseudocode)

def distribute_wens(aligned_voters, reward_pool_ens):
    per_voter = reward_pool_ens / max(1, len(aligned_voters))
    for voter in aligned_voters:
        mint_wens(voter, per_voter)
  • where reward_pool_ens is funded by treasury allocations or recycled protocol revenue.
  • wENS is a non-transferable ERC-5192 until redemption, to signal verified alignment rather than invite farming.

Hypothetical Mechanism: Sequencer fee recycling

If the DAO later captures revenue from sequencer fees, recycle it into ENS buybacks to back new wENS issuance—an options-style rewards program for aligned contributors.

# loop for ENS buybacks and wENS issuance

def reflexive_buyback():
    revenue = get_protocol_revenue()                 
    ens_bought = buy_ens_on_open_market(revenue)     
    mint_wens_backed_by(ens_bought)            
    log_event("reflexive_cycle_complete", ens_bought)

  • where revenue captures DAO or sequencer fees
  • where ens_bought applies soft buy pressure
  • where mint_wens_backed_by(ens_bought) issues wENS to verified participants

This lets ENS function as its own internal economy, where verified builders (voters are builders) earn redeemable claims (wENS) on the protocol’s long-term value.

1 Like