An update on this from the new Metagov Working Group:
First, a huge thank you to @prberg, @mdali.eth, and the other teams that presented on the metagov calls.
After considering the pros and cons of the approaches by both providers in this thread, we determined that Superfluid would be the best choice for the ENS DAO’s needs on this specific project.
Several factors influenced the decision, but the primary point in this case was our hesitation to deposit the full stream amount into the vendor’s contract. Breaking the stream up as @prberg suggested is a valid solution, but we determined that it wouldn’t be the right approach for us on this project. While Sablier both eliminates the need to wrap tokens and the risks of liquidation, in this case, the lack of capital lockup was the higher priority to our team.
We found both products to be mature offerings and would recommend either to any other DAOs’ projects or other teams in the ecosystem.