“I gotta be honest, a lot of what I’m reading doesn’t make sense to me” wasn’t meant to mean “I don’t understand what is being said”, it was meant to mean “a lot of what is being said doesn’t seem to make sense / be accurate.” I’m not dismissing anyone’s credentials, I’m questioning whether the discussion is going to be fruitful with what seem to be stabs in the dark without concrete professional advice.
If this were a discussion on just DAO governance bylaws, this wouldn’t be an issue. But since the Foundation is being brought into this, an actual Caymans entity that exists in a country’s legal system, it’s probably smarter to actually have professional advice from people that know 1) how the actual Foundation was legally setup, 2) what the laws in the Caymans actually are and 3) case law that would affect how the relationship between the DAO and Foundation would be treated by those courts.
I would never guess at this stuff at a company I’m running, idk why the DAO should guess at this either.
Well that’s kinda my point, it may not even actually be a point of contention if it turns out that the way the Foundation was actually legally setup means that it is literally separate. I’m not talking about philosophy here, and I feel like law/philosophy was being conflated.
I don’t see how anything I’ve said would violate any reasonable Code of Conduct.