I didn’t say, nor do I think that my way is the best or the only way - in fact, if you look at the list of my ENS names, you may find that I am “personally” quite open-minded and do not judge anyone, and I have quite an extensive record of being known to say that anything goes in web3. A short scroll through my tweets and you will see the post of me clad in my rainbow socks in response to the thugs who believed that Target should be trashed for taking part in Pride.
I am certainly NOT judging anyone, from San Fran to Titty City, all are welcome in my home, my life, and I will vigorously defend any human beings rights to be whomever they are and do whatever they please as long as it causes no physical harm to another person.
From a business standpoint, when a business chooses to use sexually explicit material or pays for endorsement from people associated with pornagraphy and adult content they are crossing a bridge and making a decision to state that they are speciifcally not welcoming minors, and sending a message to parents that the ENS community is not family friendly / PG rated. No matter what our views as adults, im sure we can all agree that sexually explicit material and sexualization of the human body is inappropriate for minors - a nude beach or bare breasted woman on the street is one thing, and a porn star or someone sexualizing her “titties” is not something we should be introducing to our children until they are of an age where it is appropriate. Where is the line drawn as the ENS community? Is the ENS community, as far as our message and space - is it a safe space for all ages or is it a free for all? I dont know but i believe it is a big decision and a decision to be made by voters / stakeholders. Nudity is ok on the street in San Fran…should we also have naked people walking around in the childrens section of the public library - I dont know…where is the line drawn…is everyone confortable with breasts? How about a flopping penis in the library? Time and place maybe? For now?
I think while questioning my motives, thoughts and feelings, you may want to question why we didn’t choose an active member of the LBGTQ+ community to endorse ENS and why it was a titty girl? Or, quite frankly, from my business experience, whenever I would run media for my restaurant chain of over 250+ locations, I would always make sure to produce spots that include every possibe demo - so for something like this, being web3 and all, the smart money would do a spot with a titty girl and a penis boy, and some non-gender situations - and then maybe some spots with all of them together, showing the “Spectrum of ENS names is a reflection of the spectrum of ENS holders”
Business is business - every decision needs to be pretty much the best one, and that takes careful thought and consideration of ALL aspects of ALL options…something that surely wasn’t done by current “management” 
Food for thought - and always with peace and love in mind.
