Centralising the entire DAO to a central admin panel that controls all spending and decisions completely undermines the point of the ENS DAO and decentralisation. Who is on this panel, how are they elected, what does the DAO vote on around it, etc. A briefly written bridge proposal that completely changes the structure of the DAO doesn’t make sense.
However taking learnings from a DAO retro to develop a more thought-out structure around how the DAO can continue to innovate on the goals it wants to achieve makes total sense!