[edit, update and reorder to add]
Continuing the discussion from [4.4.2] [Social] Funding Request: ENS Meta-Goverance Working Group:
On the note of privacy and the foundational fundamentals of Ethereum and public blockchain ledgers:
I understand that it is reasonable for a person(s), i.e, steward or other compensation recipients to not want to disclose being paid. In the grand scheme and like most other public good entities which receive funding from the service it provides to the public, are almost always disclosed. I assume that in any organization that has similar funding mechanisms that any persons compensated by such organizations should be blatantly aware of this. Again, yeah people have the right to privacy but this seems like it is obvious âshoe-inâ knowledge when person(s) nominate themselves for this sort of position.
Largely, transparency is arguably one of the most common arguments for using decenetralized systems as opposed to closed loop data gated institutions. Transparency is trust. For the most part, Ethereum users want the ability to be included in a hassle-free trusted environment as it inherently creates a checks and balances system to a degree that; yes we are all responsible for the management of our funds on a personal level but that transparency also teaches how to responsibly manage funding streams appropriately by redirecting allocation to endpoints have contributed to supporting and upholding the paradigms on which the system was built for. That being said, in the midst of compensation conversation; I believe itâs important to consider the balance of trust from the greater network with the transparency the network gives us.
[original, order moved]
@garypalmerjr
By increasing compensation; are you referring to the increase of individual comps based on their roles or increasing comps for individuals who commit time in support of the DAO? i.e, adding additional stream recipients.
@avsa
On Working Group Terms
In the event that the DAO decides to continue with 6 month terms and considering that the stewards of each working group are vital to totality of the DAOs mechanisms; maybe we should consider steward elections to be offset of each other. Having the entire steward council up for rotation at one time causes stress on the DAO. It seems to me that; half way through the term, there is much more activity within the DAO. We should aim to compress interaction, submissions, grants, funding streams and other initiatives to try reduce the amplitude of activity over a longer period.
Collaborate Setting Rules for Update
I would like to request to merge the topic I created âAmmend Working Group Rulesâ to this topic to include your mentions when I finish a cleaner presentation. I could even pass a version to you for review beforehand. Would that be okay?