Ammend Working Group Rules

Request For Proposal

Request from the DAO that EP1.8 [Social] Working Group Rules to be updated and replaced with the changes specified in this RFP.
Author: accessor.eth

Abstract
This Request For Proposal outlines amendments to EP1.8 Working Group Rules. By proxy this RFP will assume the same category of ‘Social’ as EP1.8. This RFP may contain complete omission of a rule, new rule introductions, the changing of grammar for clarification and or appending further detail, stipulation or guideline to ensure all rules are clearly understood and easily followed or enforced by public or private mention of any DAO steward, contributor or member.
All rules apply to the Working Groups:
Meta-Governance
Ecosystem
Public Goods

[EP1.8] [Social] Working Group Rules
This was previously numbered EP12.

Current Rules in Effect

Working Groups Rules
(a) Formation of Working Groups
(b) To create a new working group, a social proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation (‘Social Proposal’), must be put forward and passed by the DAO.
(c) A Social Proposal to create a new working group must demonstrate that the new working group is needed and the work cannot be undertaken within an existing working group.

Dissolution of Working Groups
(a) A working group can be dissolved by passing a Social Proposal requesting the dissolution of a working group or working groups.
(b) If an active proposal is put forward to dissolve a working group, all working group funds, including outgoing payments, within that working group, are to be frozen with immediate effect, pending the outcome of that vote.
(c) Upon the dissolution of a working group, any and all unspent working group funds from that working group, at the time of dissolution, must be immediately returned to the DAO treasury, without delay.

Working Group Stewards
(a) Each working group shall be managed by three stewards (hereafter a ‘Steward’ or ‘Stewards’).
(b) Stewards will be elected to serve within working groups for a set period of time (hereafter known as a ‘Term’ or ‘Terms’).
There are two Terms each calendar year:
(a) The first Term commences at 9am UTC on January 1 each year and ends immediately prior to the commencement of the second Term (‘First Term’); and
(b) The second Term commences at 9am UTC on July 1 each year and ends immediately prior to the commencement of the First Term of the following year (‘Second Term’).
(c) Stewards are responsible for overseeing the operation of working groups in accordance with these rules and the ENS DAO constitution.

The responsibilities of Stewards include, but are not limited to:
(a) Requesting working group funds from the DAO in accordance with these rules;
(b) Approving the creation of sub-groups or workstreams within a working group to undertake work and/or carry out specific projects or tasks;
(c) Dissolving sub-groups or workstreams within a working group;
(d) Using discretion to make working group funds available to sub-groups, workstreams, or contributors within a working group;
(e) Using discretion to disburse working group funds to people and/or projects in accordance with the ENS DAO constitution; and
(a) Acting as keyholders of working group multi-sigs.

Steward Eligibility and Nominations
(a) Any individual is eligible to nominate themselves to be a Steward of a working group within the DAO (‘Eligible Person’ or ‘Eligible Persons’).
(b) To be eligible to be included in the ballot for First Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9am UTC on December 6 and 9am UTC on December 9 (‘First Term Nomination Window’).
(c) To be eligible to be included in the ballot for Second Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9am UTC on June 6 and 9am UTC on June 9 (‘Second Term Nomination Window’).
(d) An Eligible Person may nominate themselves to become a Steward of a working group or working groups during the First Term Nomination Window or the Second Term Nomination Window (each a ‘Nomination Window’), by meeting the requirements set out in a call for nominations posted in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
(e) An Eligible Person who completes the steps outlined in rule 4.4 above during a Nomination Window and receives 10,000 signed votes to support their nomination will be included in the ballot as a nominee in the election for Stewards that takes place following that Nomination Window (‘Nominee’).

Steward Elections
(a) Elections for working group Stewards for the First Term of a given year will take place by a vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, commencing at 9am UTC on December 10 each year (‘First Term Election Window’).
(b) Elections for working group Stewards for the Second Term of a given year will take place by a vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, commencing at 9am UTC on June 10 each year (‘Second Term Election Window’).
(c) The top-ranked Nominees from each working group vote held during a First Term Election Window or a Second Term Election Window (each an ‘Election Window’), will fill any available positions for the role of Steward for those working groups for the Term immediately following an Election Window, based on the order in which they are ranked in each working group vote.
(d) A Nominee elected to serve as a Steward may not take up the role of Steward for more than two working groups during a single Term.

Delay of Nominations or Elections
(a) In the event that nominations or elections for Stewards take place after a Nomination Window or after an Election Window, the nomination process and/or elections shall take place, as otherwise prescribed in rules 4 and 5 above, as soon as is practicable after the missed Nomination Window or missed Election Window.
(b) In the event that an election takes place outside of an Election Window and after the commencement date of a new Term, outgoing Stewards from the previous Term shall stay in their positions as working group Stewards until immediately prior to 9am UTC the day following the end of the election, which, for the avoidance of doubt, is 120 hours after voting in those elections commenced.
(c) In the event that an election takes place outside of an Election Window and after the commencement date of a new Term, newly elected Stewards will assume the responsibilities of stewardship within working groups at 9am UTC the day following the end of the election, as defined in rule 6.2 above, for the remainder of that Term.

Removal and Replacement of Stewards
Stewards may be removed at any time by:
• a Social Proposal passed by the DAO; or
1. a simple indicative majority vote among Stewards of all working groups, with the outcome of that vote communicated in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
• Stewards may step down from their position at any time by communicating their intention to step down in the ENS governance forum.
1. In the event that a Steward is removed, steps down, or is unable to continue as a Steward, for whatever reason, prior to the end of a Term, a new election must be held to fill any vacant Steward positions, in accordance with rule 6 above.

Lead Stewards
• Each working group must appoint a lead Steward within the first five days of a Term (hereafter a ‘Lead Steward’ or ‘Lead Stewards’).
• Only current elected Stewards of a working group are eligible to serve as Lead Stewards within a given working group.
• Lead Stewards may be appointed or removed from that role at any time by a simple indicative majority vote among the Stewards of a working group, with the outcome of that vote communicated in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
• In the event that a Lead Steward steps down from the position or is removed as a Lead Steward before the end of a Term in accordance with rule 8.3 above, a new Lead Steward must be appointed within five calendar days.
• A Steward who is appointed to serve as a Lead Steward of a working group will remain in that position, as Lead Steward, from the date of appointment until the end of their elected Term as a Steward or until they are removed as a Lead Steward in accordance with rule 8.3 above or until they are removed as a Steward in accordance with rule 7 above.
• Lead Stewards are responsible for the operational management and administration of working groups and are expected to provide regular updates to the DAO in the ENS governance forum related to working group progress, achievements, and challenges.
The responsibilities of Lead Stewards include, but are not limited to:
• Acting as a representative of a working group;
• Managing resource requests from sub-groups, workstreams, and contributors within a working group;
• Initiating the disbursement of working group funds on an as-needed basis;
• Providing reports of working group spending in the ENS governance forum; and
1. Maintaining open communications with DAO participants in the ENS governance forum.

DAO Secretary
• At the start of each Term, the current Stewards of each working group shall collaborate to appoint an individual who will serve as the secretary of the DAO (hereafter ‘Secretary’ or ‘Secretaries’).
• The Secretary may be appointed or removed from that role at any time by a majority vote of all elected Stewards in a given Term with the outcome of that vote communicated in the ENS governance forum.
• The Secretary will remain in that position, as Secretary of the DAO, from the date of appointment until the end of a given Term or until the date at which they are removed from that position in accordance with rule 9.2 above.
• Secretaries are eligible to receive fair compensation for their work as Secretary of the DAO.
• Compensation for the Secretary of the DAO is to be paid by the Meta-Governance Working Group using funds requested in accordance with rule 10 below.
• Any individual is eligible to be appointed as the Secretary of the DAO, including past and present working group Stewards.
• The Secretary is responsible for managing working relationships and communications across working groups as well as performing administrative duties for the DAO.
The responsibilities of the Secretary include, but are not limited to:
• Managing a DAO-wide calendar;
• Coordinating and attending working group meetings where possible and ensuring meeting summaries are posted in the ENS governance forum;
• Assisting Stewards with coordination challenges within working groups; and
1. Acting as a multi-sig keyholder for each working group.

Working Group Funds
To request working group funds, Stewards of all working groups will collaborate to submit an active executable proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation (‘Collective Proposal’), to the DAO during the months of January, April, July, and October each calendar year (each a ‘Funding Window’).
• In order for a working group to have a funding request included in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO during a Funding Window, the funding request must have passed as a Social Proposal in the same Funding Window.
1. In the case of an emergency, where working group funds are needed by a working group outside of a Funding Window, an executable proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation, may be submitted at any time by a Steward of a working group to request funds from the DAO.
• Working group funds requested and approved in accordance with rule 10.1 above are to be paid out into separate working group multi-sigs controlled by the DAO.
• Each working group multi-sig must have four keyholders, made up of three current elected Stewards for that working group and the Secretary of the DAO for that Term, with no other keyholders permitted.
• Working group funds may be disbursed from working group multi-sigs with three-of-four keyholder signing.
1. Stewards of a given working group shall have the discretion to reallocate funds approved in a Collective Proposal where appropriate and where it is not in conflict with any rules of the DAO, DAO bylaws, or the ENS DAO constitution.

Compensation for Stewards and Lead Stewards
• Stewards are eligible to receive fair compensation for their work as a Steward or Lead Steward in the DAO.
• All requests for Steward or Lead Steward compensation must be detailed in a Collective Proposal for working group funds submitted to the DAO in accordance with rule 10.1 above.
1. Stewards may not receive compensation for their role as a Steward or Lead Steward outside of that compensation expressly provided for in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO in accordance with rule 10.1 above.


Proposed Working Group Rule Ammendments

Formation of Working Groups
(a) To establish a new working group, a ‘Social Proposal’ must be put forward and approved by the DAO, as defined by the ENS governance documentation.
(b) The ‘Social Proposal’ for creating a new working group must demonstrate the necessity of the new group and that its objectives cannot be accomplished within an existing working group.
(c) The working group must receive funding from the parent working group.
(d) However, new working groups may receive funding from sources outside of the greater ENS ecosystem (not to be confused with the ENS Ecosystem Working Group).
(e) New working groups must establish a person in charge.

Dissolution of Working Groups
(a) A working group may be dissolved by passing a ‘Social Proposal’ requesting its dissolution or the dissolution of multiple working groups.
(b) When an active proposal is initiated to dissolve a working group, all of its funds, including outgoing payments, must be immediately frozen, pending the outcome of the vote.
(c) Upon the dissolution of a working group, any remaining unspent funds must be promptly returned to the DAO treasury.
(d) The dissolution of a working group must be announced publicly on the discussion forum.
(f) Dissolution requires a social vote in a voting window.

Working Group Stewards
(a) Each working group shall be overseen by three stewards (referred to as ‘Stewards’).
(b) Stewards are elected to serve within working groups for a specific term.
(c) Two terms are held each calendar year:
(i) The first term starts at 9 am UTC on January 1 and ends just before the commencement of the second term (‘First Term’).
(ii) The second term begins at 9 am UTC on July 1 and concludes just before the start of the first term of the following year (‘Second Term’).
(d) Stewards are responsible for managing working groups in compliance with these rules and the ENS DAO constitution.
Steward Responsibilities
(a) Steward responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
(b) Requesting working group funds from the DAO as per these rules.
(c) Approving the establishment of sub-groups or workstreams within a working group to carry out specific projects or tasks.
(d) Dissolving sub-groups or workstreams within a working group.
(e) Exercising discretion to allocate working group funds to sub-groups, workstreams, or contributors within a working group.
(f) Exercising discretion to distribute working group funds to individuals or projects in line with the ENS DAO constitution.
(g) Acting as keyholders of working group multi-signature wallets.

Steward Eligibility and Nominations
(a) Any individual can nominate themselves to become a Steward of a working group within the DAO (‘Eligible Person’ or ‘Eligible Persons’).
(b) To be eligible for inclusion in the ballot for First Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9 am UTC on December 6 and 9 am UTC on December 9 (‘First Term Nomination Window’).
(c) To be eligible for inclusion in the ballot for Second Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9 am UTC on June 6 and 9 am UTC on June 9 (‘Second Term Nomination Window’).
(d) An Eligible Person may nominate themselves to become a Steward of a working group or working groups during the First Term Nomination Window or the Second Term Nomination Window (each a ‘Nomination Window’) by meeting the requirements outlined in a call for nominations posted in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
(e) An Eligible Person who successfully completes the steps mentioned in rule 4.4 during a Nomination Window and garners 10,000 signed votes in support of their nomination will be included as a nominee in the election for Stewards following that Nomination Window (‘Nominee’).

Steward Elections
(a) Elections for working group Stewards for the First Term of a given year will be conducted by a vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, beginning at 9 am UTC on December 10 each year (‘First Term Election Window’).
(b) Elections for working group Stewards for the Second Term of a given year will be carried out by a vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, starting at 9 am UTC on June 10 each year (‘Second Term Election Window’).
(c) The top-ranked Nominees from each working group vote during a First Term Election Window or a Second Term Election Window (each an ‘Election Window’) will fill any available positions for the role of Steward for those working groups for the Term immediately following an Election Window, based on their ranking in each working group vote.
(d) A Nominee elected as a Steward may not serve as a Steward for more than two working groups during a single Term.
(f) An elected steward may not receive compensation from ENS Labs as an employee and from the DAO for steward compensation. However, if a steward is an employee of ENS Labs, they may choose to opt out of one of two compensations.

Delay of Nominations or Elections
(a) In case nominations or elections for Stewards take place after a Nomination Window or after an Election Window, the nomination process and elections shall occur as soon as feasible following the missed Nomination Window or missed Election Window.
(b) If an election takes place outside an Election Window and after the start of a new Term, outgoing Stewards from the previous Term will continue in their roles as working group Stewards until just before 9 am UTC on the day following the end of the election, which, for clarity, is 120 hours after voting in those elections commenced.
(c) If an election takes place outside an Election Window and after the start of a new Term, newly elected Stewards will assume the responsibilities of stewardship within working groups at 9 am UTC on the day following the end of the election, as defined in rule 6.2, for the remainder of that Term.

Removal and Replacement of Stewards
(a) Stewards may be removed at any time by:
(i) A ‘Social Proposal’ passed by the DAO; or
(ii) A simple indicative majority vote among Stewards of all working groups, with the outcome of that vote communicated in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
(iii) Stewards may resign from their position at any time by communicating their intention to resign in the ENS governance forum.
(iv) If a Steward is removed, resigns, or is unable to continue as a Steward before the end of a Term, a new election must be held to fill any vacant Steward positions, following the rules in rule 6.
(v) If a steward becomes unavailable, unreachable, and attempts to communicate are unsuccessful, the stewards of the respective working group may decide to hold any compensation until the matter is resolved. This includes events such as a medical emergency or involuntary confinement.

Lead Stewards
(a) Each working group must designate a lead Steward within the first five days of a Term (referred to as a ‘Lead Steward’ or ‘Lead Stewards’).
(b) Only current elected Stewards of a working group are eligible to serve as Lead Stewards within that working group.
(c) Lead Stewards may be appointed or removed from that role at any time by a simple indicative majority vote among the Stewards of the working group, with the outcome of that vote communicated in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum.
(d) If a Lead Steward steps down or is removed from the position before the end of a Term in accordance with rule 8.3, a new Lead Steward must be appointed within five calendar days.
(e) A Steward appointed as a Lead Steward will remain in that position, as Lead Steward, from the date of appointment until the end of their elected Term as a Steward or until they are removed as a Lead Steward in accordance with rule 8(c) or until they are removed as a Steward in accordance with rule 7.
(f) Lead Stewards are responsible for the operational management and administration of working groups and are expected to provide regular updates to the DAO in the ENS governance forum regarding the progress, accomplishments, and challenges of the working group.

Lead Steward Responsibilities
(a) Lead Steward responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
(b) Acting as a representative of a working group.
(c) Managing resource requests from sub-groups, workstreams, and contributors within a working group.
(d) Initiating the disbursement of working group funds on an as-needed basis.
(e) Providing reports of working group spending in the ENS governance forum.
(f) Maintaining open communications with DAO participants in the ENS governance forum.
(g) Resolving any internal conflicts within the working group.

DAO Secretary
(a) At the beginning of each Term, the current Stewards of each working group shall collaborate to appoint an individual to serve as the secretary of the DAO (referred to as the ‘Secretary’ or ‘Secretaries’).
(b) The Secretary may be appointed or removed from that role at any time by a majority vote of all elected Stewards in a given Term, with the outcome of that vote communicated in the ENS governance forum.
(c) The Secretary will remain in that position, as the Secretary of the DAO, from the date of appointment until the end of a given Term or until the date at which they are removed from that position in accordance with rule 9.2.
(d) Secretaries are eligible to receive fair compensation for their work as the Secretary of the DAO. See Compensation
(e) Compensation for the Secretary of the DAO will be provided by the Meta-Governance Working Group using funds requested in accordance with rule 10.
(f) Any individual is eligible to be appointed as the Secretary of the DAO, including past and present working group Stewards.
(g) The Secretary is responsible for managing working relationships and communications across working groups, as well as performing administrative duties for the DAO.

Secretary Responsibilities
Secretary responsibilities include, but are not limited to:
(a) Managing a DAO-wide calendar.
(b) Coordinating and attending working group meetings when possible and ensuring meeting summaries are posted in the ENS governance forum.
(c) Assisting Stewards with coordination challenges within working groups.
(d) Acting as a multi-signature keyholder for each working group.
(e) Investigating any reports of misappropriation of funds.
(f) Resolving any special funding requests outside of any active funding stream

Working Group Funds
(a) To request working group funds, Stewards of all working groups will collaborate to submit an active executable proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation (‘Collective Proposal’), to the DAO during the months of January, April, July, and October each calendar year (each a ‘Funding Window’).
(b) For a working group to have a funding request included in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO during a Funding Window, the funding request must have been approved as a Social Proposal in the same Funding Window.
(c) In the case of an emergency where working group funds are needed outside of a Funding Window, a Steward of a working group may submit an executable proposal at any time to request funds from the DAO.
(d) Working group funds that are requested and approved in accordance with rule 10.1 are to be transferred to separate working group multi-signature wallets controlled by the DAO.
(e) Each working group multi-signature wallet must have four keyholders, comprising three current elected Stewards for that working group and the Secretary of the DAO for that Term, with no other keyholders permitted.
(f) Working group funds may be disbursed from working group multi-signature wallets with the consensus of three out of four keyholders.
(g) Stewards of a particular working group have the discretion to reallocate funds that have been approved in a Collective Proposal, as long as it is done appropriately and does not conflict with any rules of the DAO, DAO bylaws, or the ENS DAO constitution.

Compensation from ENS DAO
(a) Stewards are eligible to receive fair compensation for their roles as Stewards or Lead Stewards in the DAO. This shall be included within the budget submitted by the the working group at the beginning of a term. The previous term sets the compensation rate of the next term.
(b) All requests for Steward or Lead Steward compensation must be detailed in a Collective Proposal for working group funds submitted to the DAO in accordance with rule 10.1.
(c) Stewards may not receive compensation for their roles as Stewards or Lead Stewards outside of the compensation explicitly provided for in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO
(d) Any persons receiving compensation from ENS DAO must either have a label or registered ENS name to receive payment. This is to provide clarity for the treasury and community and reduce speculation and or misappropriation of funds
(f) Members of the DAO or any other persons who receive a compensation must be included in a master list of compensation recipients. There is no reason that a person(s) who is working for the DAO or any affiliated and established working groups, funding stream endpoints or any others, require discretion. However, a compensation recipient may request anonymity in writing to the lead steward of the Meta-Governance working group.

2 Likes

Amendments to the working group rules would not classify as an RFP.

I recommend:

  • Changing this to a discussion
  • Presenting solely a summary of changes initially that focuses discussion on the suggested revisions
  • After feedback, present in proposal form with the amendment text properly formatted

A model and precedence for this process can be seen in the following proposals:

If concurrent discussions or proposals arise that do not directly conflict, authors should consider consolidating them to simplify discussion for participants.

1 Like

Your right, discussion first is a better route. Presenting the changes only would help clarification. I was actually thinking about that after I had submitted. I will edit this when I am able to, hopefully later today.

I assumed that this would suffice as discussion before moving to final proposal.

On that note, is the RFP process something that is needed in the governance process? Historically, it seems to add confusion and is underutilized.

Since it’s established and represented in the governance docs, it’s good to keep in the toolbox for specific situations where it’s useful.

RFPs are for soliciting service providers to provide a specified service, they’re unrelated to governance changes.

Without a diff, it’s impossible to see what changes you are actually proposing here.

Edit: Having used a diff tool, there are a lot of seemingly pointless grammatical and typographical changes. Is this another product of ChatGPT?

Maybe you could expand on the pointless typographical changes.

The diff is filled with them. Did you check the changes yourself after asking ChatGPT to amend the bylaws for you?

according to the governance process

RFPs vary in detail and complexity. An RFP for improving the DAO’s documentation may only be a paragraph or two long, and proposals for it will be equally short. At the other extreme, an RFP for managing the DAO’s funds may be lengthy, and a successful proposal could be multiple pages justifying the proposer’s ability to take on the job.

“An RFP is a request from the DAO for contributors to offer to do work on its behalf, and receive compensation in return.”

This is not a request for proposals to receive competitive bids to complete the task. You have posted a suggestion to change the working group rules with the work already performed by yourself.

To your credit, the language in those docs is confusing and needs to be clarified to avoid semantic debates such as this.

1 Like

This is true. It’s something that has been on my mind for quite a long time. Also true, semantic debates should only reserve our time in extreme cases of importance but are more than likely to continue to occur within. That being said; semantic errors or of which bring confusion in directives, publications, terms…et al, should always be clarified. Especially in organizations issuing funding streams. The contrary for counterintuitive the DAO is in place to establish guiding principles or directions to ensure the steadiness of internal mechanisms.

Objectively, what is preventing a person(s) from requesting from the DAO:

  • ( as in elected or non-elected members )
  • an initiative for change that is beyond the ability of the requestor
  • is simple enough that a member may easily complete the task
  • invoke change may not require a compensation
  • or that the task may be valued lesser the average total cost of gas for DAO wide vote.

Which brings up the question or thinking point; should we consider comparative measures of proposals total gas cost vs. cost of implementation.