That’s great! I think the DAO or Labs should use a professional polling service to take the pulse of the community on this very important topic. Has this been done before? What would the process look like?
Nobody’s current ownership is being infringed but what about future ownership. Why would the DAO interfere with future ownership? Every person and organization should have an equal opportunity to own the name they want.
Bumping this in response to this weeks L2 Interop call.
I queried ‘in an ideal world’ the timeline over which we would implement such functionality so as to execute on allowing the DAO to give l2.eth to the interop effort.
@0xtiti stated 2 weeks ideally. I noted that EthCC is on the cards, but noting a number of executables are being discussed for execution soon I think that if the appetite exists for this to be voted on, we should move it forward.
See this post for specific discussion:
Personally, if this happens, I’d like to see this as a separate controller noting:
The separation of concerns also provides executable audit independence with other proposals that have registrar controller related considerations e.g. [Executable] Enable L2 Reverse Registrars and new .eth registrar controller