This is true. It’s something that has been on my mind for quite a long time. Also true, semantic debates should only reserve our time in extreme cases of importance but are more than likely to continue to occur within. That being said; semantic errors or of which bring confusion in directives, publications, terms…et al, should always be clarified. Especially in organizations issuing funding streams. The contrary for counterintuitive the DAO is in place to establish guiding principles or directions to ensure the steadiness of internal mechanisms.
Objectively, what is preventing a person(s) from requesting from the DAO:
- ( as in elected or non-elected members )
- an initiative for change that is beyond the ability of the requestor
- is simple enough that a member may easily complete the task
- invoke change may not require a compensation
- or that the task may be valued lesser the average total cost of gas for DAO wide vote.
Which brings up the question or thinking point; should we consider comparative measures of proposals total gas cost vs. cost of implementation.