πŸ›οΈπŸ“ž MetaGov Working Group – 2025 Meetings: Tuesdays at 2pm UTC (Currently 10:00 am ET)

Details

Time: Tuesdays at 9:00 am ET (1pm UTC).
Google Meet Link: meet.google.com/bms-grvp-jbw

Stewards:

Agenda

  1. Weekly Endowment Updates (@karpatkey + @Steakhouse )
  2. General DAO Updates Section
    1. Open Space for SPP Discussion
  3. Open Discussion

β€”

Notes :memo:

1. Weekly Endowment Updates (@karpatkey + @Steakhouse )

  • Endowment at $81.8M
  • Recovering from last week
  • PUR v5 on queue
  • TWAP resumed

  • Karpatkey needs a PUR update that will allow the use of USDS
  • Blockful reviewed the payload for it already
  • Endowment monthly report forum post.
  • Endomnet permissions update forum post.

2. General DAO Updates Section

2.1 Open Space for SPP Discussion

  • Recap from the discussion around service providers
  • @cap from Namespace did a 3-hour livestream last week with people from ENS, including AvsA, who spoke for 40 minutes about the service provider program which will be helpful for everyone to check out.

Similar Proposals Question

  • What happens with the proposals that are essentially doing the same thing?
  • Similar proposals are accepted, and all could be funded (it’s up to delegates)
  • Proposals simply need to meet eligibility criteria
  • However, delegates are encouraged to include all who they thing provides great service to the protocol or the DAO

Open Source Requirements

  • Questions about the MIT license and open-sourced codebase.
  • The idea is that this is the work that benefits the ENS ecosystem and is also a public good.
  • Concerns that open-sourcing their proprietary client/apps removes the source for any other funding.
  • Core services can be open source, with peripheral offerings being closed source.
  • The program may fund an open-source SDK, for example, while allowing private repos for other initiatives.
  • The work funded by the program should be MIT licensed, focusing on what is planned to be open-sourced.

Copeland Method and Ranked-choice Voting

  • Snapshot introduced the ranked-choice voting method (see X post)
  • Ranked-choice voting demo from Snapshot.
  • Visualisation is needed for more transparency and insight into how the casted vote would impact the applicants
  • Also, it doesn’t consider eligibility for 2-year streams
    • Agora is building this!

SPP Proposals Deadline

  • March 31, 11:59:59pm
  • Midnight UTC is being considered as a cutoff point.
  • Will post clarifying comment about the exact moment by the time applications need to be submitted.

Delegate meeting (next MetaGov call)

  • Next Tuesday will be the delegate meeting
  • Intended to be like a Delegate forum (all-hands delegate call)
  • The goal is to provide ENS delegates with the necessary information for the upcoming month
  • Question whether we should record the Delegate call
  • Grassroots work will be done this week to reach out to everyone personally to ensure they have the delegate call on their calendar.

What’s next for MetaGov (plans for 2025)

  • Delegate office hours, proposal reviews, and delegate onboarding with calendars are in the works.
  • After SPP, there are plans for the endowment, including auto-funding and more.
  • The Security Council is coming up on its one-year anniversary, and fixing challenges around the number of active delegated votes is a big initiative.
  • Iterating on how the Meta Governance group runs meetings, such as changing the first meeting of the month to a delegate meeting.
  • Regulatory requirements need to be focused on.
  • Actions are being taken to improve coordination in the DAO, such as the delegate all-hands call.
  • The goal is to increase delegation and voter engagement.
  • There are ideas around treasury management, such as the DAO directly staking ETH.
  • Looking back at the one-to-one ENS distribution to grant recipients, those votes are not getting delegated, so a better mechanism is needed.
  • There is research going on in the background on Namechain to understand what the prices should be.
  • And more improvements and experiments

3. Open Discussion

  • /
5 Likes

Agenda and Minutes for MetaGov Meeting, April 1st, 2025 [Delegate Forum]

Details

Time: Tuesdays at 10:00 am ET (2pm UTC).
Google Meet Link: meet.google.com/bms-grvp-jbw

Stewards:

Agenda

  1. Weekly Endowment Updates (@karpatkey + @Steakhouse )
  2. Upcoming KPK PUR Proposal
  3. Upcoming Events in April
    1. SPP Aplications - Cam
    2. SPP Voting Methodology - Avsa
    3. Upcoming Proposal Schedule
  4. Review our Security Council Test
  5. ENS Delegations and Token Distributions for Term 6
  6. Working Group Process Enhancements
  7. Open Discussion

Details

Time: Tuesdays at 10:00 am ET (2pm UTC).
Google Meet Link: meet.google.com/bms-grvp-jbw

Stewards:

Agenda

  1. Weekly Endowment Updates (@karpatkey + @Steakhouse )
  2. Upcoming KPK PUR Proposal
  3. Upcoming Events in April
    1. SPP Applications - Cam
    2. SPP Voting Methodology - Avsa
    3. Upcoming Proposal Schedule
  4. Review our Security Council Test
  5. ENS Delegations and Token Distributions for Term 6
  6. Working Group Process Enhancements
  7. Open Discussion

β€”

1. Weekly Endowment Updates (@karpatkey + @Steakhouse )

Karpatkey Endowment Update –

  • ~$75M in assets (32% ETH, 68% stablecoins)
  • APR at 3.3%
  • TWAP below threshold due to ETH price drop
  • Request for transparent fee reporting
  • 99.9% funds allocation: ENS- Yield/Fee Tracking - Google Sheets

2. Upcoming KPK PUR Proposal

  • Discussion around KPK permissions update
  • TWAP handles ETH-to-USDC conversions.
  • Safeguards are in place by having multiple multisigs.
  • Upcoming PUR update to include Zodiac Roles modifier.

3. Upcoming Events in April

  1. SPP Applications - Cam
  2. SPP Voting Methodology - Avsa
  3. Upcoming Proposal Schedule

SPP Applications & Voting Process

  • 25 applications; average request ~$420K.
  • Ranked choice voting (Copeland method).
    • No other DAO is using Copeland.
    • Ranking candidates is a clear method.
  • Agora visualization for transparency.
  • Delegates have expressed confusion about the process.
  • Concern: How to support non-funded projects in the long run.

Voting & Proposal Timeline

  • Two-stage voting:
    • Social votes (similar to service providers, working group funding).
    • Executable votes (fund allocations).

Basic vs. Extended Scope Debate

  • Delegates are unsure how to differentiate.
  • Proposal to vote separately on scopes.
  • Request for a way to differentiate between extended and basic scope.
    • There should be two different options to vote for each service provider.
  • Concern: Splitting votes may impact providers with two scopes.

Delegate Concerns & Adjustments

  • Proposal for providers to update scopes within five days.
  • Proposal for MetaGov Delegates to rework the entire process.
  • Need clearer differentiation between basic & extended scopes.
  • Calls, forum posts, and temp checks planned for feedback.

Funding Strategy & Future Adjustments

  • Ensuring fair distribution (smaller teams vs. large budgets).
  • Concern over β€œall-or-nothing” funding model.
  • Proposal: Rank providers first, then select preferred scope.

Next Steps

  • Neto to analyze the impact of voting structure changes.
  • Notion for tracking strategy updates.
  • Telegram group for real-time coordination.
  • Future consideration: Separate budgets (2-year extended, 1-year extended, basic)

Read the AI summary/notes (unfiltered, unedited, does not guarantee accuracy, but still good).

2 Likes