1. Weekly Endowment Updates - @kpk + @Steakhouse
- Weekly commentary:
- DAO at $110M with 60% in ETH and 40% in stables.
- 2.8% APR, 2.1% net APR
- Negative $1.78M loss due to ETH price drop
2. Update on the Endowment Fee Structure (Metagov + kpk)
- Moved to the AUM (Assets Under Management) only fee model.
- Aligns the treasury manager better with the ENS Endowment goals.
- Increases transparency on how the fees are calculated.
- Previous fee structure was a 50 basis point AUM fee (0.5% per year) with a fee cap at 100M, plus a 10% performance fee on all yields above 4%
- The new fee structure also has the 0.5% AUM initial fee, capped at 100M, but the fee starts decaying (if the AUM increases 4x, the fee decreases 2x)
- The services provided by KPK are the same.
3. ENS Holiday Awards Referral Program - @lightwalker.eth
- The first ENS referral program, ENS Holiday Awards, is now live.
- Leaderboard website is live.
- Users can generate a referral link and share it to qualify for a share of a $10,000 prize pool.
- The program is focused on distribution channels through products with large existing audiences, such as wallets and block explorers, to incentivize them to prioritize .eth name registrations and renewals.
- ENS Holiday Awards are an experiment to discover how to structure referral programs, intending to present a tested proposal to the DAO later.
- Referrals consider both registrations and renewals.
- Scoring is based on referral years, not the quantity of referrals.
- ENS Manager app implemented the referrer parameter on the link.
4. [RFC] Delegation Increase Incentives System - @zeugh.eth
- Been under discussion status for about 2 months.
- The system aims to distribute ENS to active delegates and delegators.
- Active delegates are those voting over 70% of the time.
- A proposal version will be brought either this week or early next week.
5. Steward Elections Term 7 - Update on Timing and Next Steps
- There are currently 2 proposals that affect nominations / elections:
-
- ENS Admin panel proposal
-
- ENS retro proposal
-
- The ENS retro proposal delays the election by 4 months.
- MetaGov will wait for these proposals to have a resolution.
- If both get rejected, the plan is to handle nominations and elections.
- The goal is to have a bigger time of nomination and preparation time to get more people engaged.
- Nomination window starts after the proposal has a resolution one way or the other.
6. [Temp Check] ENS Retro: An ENS DAO Retrospective
- A retro is proposed to provide industry leadership.
- There has been discussion about the structure of the retro on the forum.
- Changes to the Retro proposal:
- Initially, the retro was to be led by James, Thomas, Arnold, and Metagov.
- The retro will now be led independently by Metagov to avoid bias.
- There will be a proposal to extend the working group term until March next year, until the retro is finished.
- If one working group steward wants to step down, the other 2 can continue.
- If all 3 working group stewards step down, the working group will pause, and multisig funds will be returned to the DAO.
- More clarity has been added around how the budget plans are to be developed, primarily around the specification section.
- The first proposal is for immediate action with a budget of up to 4 months.
- The second proposal involves a snapshot vote to signal DAO support
- Followed by refinement by Metagov for clearer scope, budget, and goals.
- The budget will be tied to deliverables, timeline, and scope.
- Data discovery is a big part of the retro, and it would be good to understand what data is already fully qualified.
- Specific deliverables, proposal scope, and budget breakdown will be presented by Metagov.
- The idea is to extend until March, complete the retro, and gather more data from DAO contributors before deciding on the next steps for SPP, working groups, or other structures.
- Eugene from Metagov will be present on a call to discuss the proposal, possibly during a MetaGov working group call or at an independent time.
7. Open discussion
7.1 Woof
- Woop offers ENS to use the streamer for streaming yield-bearing tokens.
- Woop’s streamer product is free, audited, permissionless, and immutable, allowing streaming of native and yield-bearing tokens.
- By using the streamer for streaming yield-bearing tokens, ENS can potentially earn around $400k to $500k in profit annually.
- Currently streaming around $9.5M for OpenZeppelin, Tally, Gauntlet, and themselves.
- Read their entire proposal here.
