It’s in the interest of the ENS DAO since it upholds our principles. These addresses should have received the 2x bonus according to the rules as stated by the allocation blog post. Not getting it was a mistake done by the team during calculation.
Correcting such a mistake and being just and good is the right play here. It’s through actions like these that the character of the ENS DAO will be defined.
I get where you are coming from. Keeping more tokens for the DAO treasury and not giving out to pepole who will probably dump it may make the most financial sense for the DAO. But money and token value is not everything.
In fact I would argue that in a world of abundance and with a treasury as strong as ENS’s being moral, just and good and setting a good example is of far greater value than of having more tokens in the treasury.