+1 to Leons comments above.
This proposal (about ENS’ core runway) should have been highlighted before the endowment discussion, currently it just seems to be confusing the topic. Understand this is only the first step, but the timing is making it hard.
Not only this, but over the course of this discussion the proposal has seen huge changes:
imo this should be being led by a treasurer or a treasury management subgroup, not one off posts about large amounts of ENS DAO treasury.
EDIT: Agree with below, me highlighting these changes as being the problem with the proposal when Nick edited it after my comments doesn’t make sense, +1, overall just a LOT in a single post with multiple ongoing treasury threads.
Also @nick.eth above you mention “forthcoming treasury management subgroup” there’s no outline of it in the most recent Q1/Q2 2023 Working Group Steward Nominations & Elections post.
EDIT: Been corrected on the Working group vs Subgroup differentiation, but think how this subgroup is selected matters a lot - Making sure it’s non-biased, treasury literate individuals.