Seems like there’s strong support for the MetaGov working group to live on then. Though rather than having MG stewards be temporary as described I’d argue it makes sense to have a full term while the Foundation is stood up as a supportive measure. Importantly, it would mean that the Foundation (and chosen DAO liaison) will be able to interface with an existing structure to see how things operate and where improvements can be made (rather than just starting from scratch or having a temp WG).
Re this, disagree. Having some public facing working group for the DAO is important, especially with the current state of the market and DAO.
Again, given how the MG working group current operates (in terms of contributing stewards) this same group shouldn’t be the one that takes on this role. ie. A new steward election for MetaGov working group, and a public facing Ecosystem + Public goods WG makes sense.
+1 to these timelines, I wonder if the immediate next step should be making a proposal to be voted on (about the restructure, elections, etc) then run the steward elections?
This is an interesting one, I think +1 to the 6 month term, i do wonder how hard it will be to stand anything efficient up within that time, but it makes more sense than 12 or 18 month terms.