In general terms I’d agree with this.
A few suggestions:
-
The Stewards who are elected shouldn’t have any other position at ENS or duties with Labs.
-
The ability for the foundation or the other stewards (either here or as a foundation capacity) to submit a change or removal of a steward. We have had many absent stewards in the past years who still came to collect the check every month and burden others with their responsibilities.
-
In the past years we hosted Community Calls (discord, google meets) and it didn’t yield a great result, nowadays our structure is more defined and I trust that this will act also as a window for the broader community to have access and knowledge about our protocol as well as the other bodies (Labs, Foundation) to have a public accountability place.
-
The small grants amount seems a bit too small for the scope of things like PG used to do. But I guess that can be defined post this temp-check.
-
What would be the role of the Secretary in this new context? (I understand the scribe)
Can you develop? Meaning that the board should take on the PG aspect?