Thereâs an error in the distribution chart where it amounts to 100.005% - Iâm guessing that the Active Discord User allocation should really be 0.12% which would make it an even 100%
Not that it makes a large difference, but since that figure was brought up I figured it might be good to point that out
Where did 0xaccountantâs posts go? Did they delete them or did someone remove them? We need and audit of this now too. Sigh.
There are too many insiders now deflecting for there not to be a full audit. Disappearing posts, hostile tone, and no more clarity to the OPâs brutal, but now seemingly intelligent wish.
The worst thing that can happen to the ENS is for drama with misappropriated funds, and no transparency. One of the most important things for a democratic system to work is delegating power, not trying to hoard it. We get it, everyone is wealthy here and cocksure in their opinions, but it is important to understand most people in the world are not, and why we all wanted to decentralize things. If the DAO is corrupted, it becomes de facto centralized.
These tokens were distributed, at TNLâs discretion, to contributors who had done extraordinary work in helping to establish the DAO.
Appeals to emotion arenât helpful, they are the root of the potential problems pointed out.
I doubt that quoted post was emotionally charged. Your post is emotionally charged.
Please be objective. Yes an audit is good. No, jumping into conclusions and accusing people of being corrupt is wrong. You can open a proposal for an audit, include your objectives and goals.
I doubt that quoted post was emotionally charged. Your post is emotionally charged.
Please be more polite. Your tone comes off condescending here. I did not say emotionally charged. Alisha.eth used a logical fallacy to justify things when unneeded. Emotionally charged and an appeal to emotion are vastly different things.
No, jumping into conclusions and accusing people of being corrupt is wrong.
Pointing out that drama from potential corruption from a system likely flawed enough to facilitate that is a bad absolutely is not the same as accusing people of being corrupt. Please rephrase, this seems a bit uncivil.
You can open a proposal for an audit, include your objectives and goals.
This absolutely will be done, but it is important for yourself to do it first rather than deflecting to a low ranking member of the DAO if you believe in it.
Anyone can make a proposal and you certainly can. Since you seem to be more passionate and ahead on the topic I would suggest you put forth the request. I look forward to reading your ideas.
Iâm not a âhigh ranking memberâ by the way just so you know if youâre wondering.
0xaccountant was a sock-puppet account of inplcoâs and has been banned. His posts were mistakenly deleted as part of the ban process, and have now been restored.
Ask about the percentages and who controls them
See my post caught some tractions. Lol
Can I please get a grant? I have amazing ideas and will show my work along the way. How do I apply for these said grants. ?
If your grant relates to ENS or the ENS ecosystem there are a few different ways to receive a grant or funds from the ENS DAO:
Gitcoin Grants
Participate in the ENS ecosystem round of Gitcoin Grants. The next Gitcoin Grants Round, GR15, starts on September 7th and there will be a $69k round that will be distributed to ENS-related projects.
Working Group grants
Attend an Ecosystem working group call, which take place weekly, and pitch your idea or show proof of work to stewards. If your work is specifically DAO related, you could attend the MetaGovernance call, which also takes place every Monday.
ENS grants platform
Submit a grant to the ENS small grants platform at ensgrants.xyz. This month each working group will run a round awarding 1ETH to 5 projects with the highest number of votes. You can vote with $ENS. The next round will kick off in the next week or two, so be sure to follow the ENS DAO Twitter account for updates.
DAO-wide proposal
If you are looking for a larger sum, a DAO-wide proposal may be the best path forward, which requires moving an Executable Proposal through the governance process on this forum, or holding 100k $ENS to post a vote directly onchain.
Important discussion
This didnât age well