ENS Name Normalization

🧑‍💻 ENS Development Standards
172

Here is how I understood your suggestion, which I think would work:

  • we always do this mapping during normalization:

    • 6F0 → 660
    • 6F1 → 661
    • 6F2 → 662
    • 6F3 → 663
    • 6F7 → 667
    • 6F8 → 668
    • 6F9 → 669

  • the second examples of case 1 and case 3 both normalize to their first examples
    [661 662 663] and [661 662 664]

  • in case 2 the second example normalizes to [661 662 6F4] and will be its own name, the first example remains as is.

In total you’d get 4 distinct names.
Do you see any other issues here?

2 Likes